![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
According to the Guardian, there are more redwoods (coastal and sequoia) in England than in California (500,000 to 80,000) That doesn't seem right to me, but I can't find accurate numbers for either place.
The driving factor was a Victorian garden trend (or set of trends).
The article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Save_the_Redwoods_League (Note the prevalence of Woman's clubs (and Garden clubs) in the preservation of habitat.)
Giant Sequoia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequoiadendron_giganteum
The Guardian article: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/apr/23/giant-redwoods-britain-uk-sequoia-specieswatch
The driving factor was a Victorian garden trend (or set of trends).
The article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Save_the_Redwoods_League (Note the prevalence of Woman's clubs (and Garden clubs) in the preservation of habitat.)
Giant Sequoia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequoiadendron_giganteum
The Guardian article: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/apr/23/giant-redwoods-britain-uk-sequoia-specieswatch
Re: Pursuing this is fascinating
Date: 2024-03-28 05:55 am (UTC)From: https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/2021-fire-season-impacts-to-giant-sequoias.htm
Back math: 2,261x20 (5% loss) is the lower end, with 44,000 sequoia. 3637x33 (3 percent loss) is the higher estimate of 100911 trees. This is old growth; sequouia trees over 4' in diameter. This does not include coast redwoods.
The Guardian is wrong. But not wrong enough. The fire season means the problem is going to get much worse.